June 29, 2007

Oh My Joost!

Joost

So today  I got to play with Joost for the first time. Joost is basically an internet TV platform. Imagine the entertainment value of TV combined with the interactive possibilities of the internet and you have Joost.

It is currently in the beta stage but you don't need to download any of the files you actually watch. Joost was created by the people behind Kazaa and Skype so it is based on peer to peer file sharing software. This basically means that it doesn't require anything like the same bandwidth that services such as YouTube require (when for example everyone wants to watch the same video) and it helps with ensuring the content can't be stored permanently on anyone's machine, which would be a violation of copyright.

Whenever you are watching a piece of content on Joost, the peer to peer software 'takes' 8 second chunks of that content from other computers in the Joost network. This ensures that there is no one server that is having to push out a huge amount of data; the data demands are shared around the network. You can find out more about the technical details here and also watch the funky 'What's Joost' video here.

For advertisers, this is the holy grail - a platform that allows a fusion of content and advertising. Because Joost is online, it can track what you watch, how long you watch it for and so it can provide advertisers with incredibly accurate targeting, both demographically and attitudinally.

Also, because those Joost boys are ful of the joys of Open Source, developers are being encouraged to produce widgets to sit within Joost to enhance the user experience. 'Extras' that come as standard in the Joost package are Messenger, Channel Chat (talking to people watching what you are watching) and RSS news feeds from the web.

The advertising opportunities are hugely diverse - it opens the door for advertisers to create their own channel. Imagine if L'Oreal were to buy the rights to Desperate Housewives and show it on the L'Oreal channel on Joost? THey could then ensure a fusion of advertising and content - the possibilities for product placement are enormous.

Because it is online, users can click through from adverts to websites and still watch the content in a minimised form. 

Also it offers the full accountability that advertisers cherish with internet advertising as it currently stands.

I can't explain how cool Joost is - it is just like watching TV, but with everything the internet can offer.

And as if TV weren't enough, they are looking to launch a mobile platform at some point next year! Internet TV over mobile!

I'm sure I will post more about this, but I would advise trying to get hold of the beta version, or just keeping your ears open for more developments. 

May 25, 2007

Knowledge and Ideas

Bluesky

Someone once told me that this industry is "inherently based on people's knowledge and ideas."

That means the output of agencies is going to be directly linked to the knowledge and ideas of the people that work there.

I think this often gets forgotten in what is an incredibly busy and at times demanding industry.

That's why I am so pleased that Omnicom have stepped up to the plate and are running their first and hopefully annual Omnicom Summer School this year in August.

Check out this link for more information http://openhouse.typepad.com/omnicomsummerschool

It is a great way for people who want to get into the industry to get a head start, learn more about the various sectors, meet and network with some of the best agencies in the world and hopefully enjoy themselves as well.

If anyone has any questions, or knows of anyone who might be interested, please pass it on.

Have a good weekend,

Steve

Spot the Bull

OK, something fun for the bank holiday weekend - a lovely game for Orange by Poke where they have slapped a GPS tracker on a bull in a field and you have to pick where that bull will be at 3pm. Winner gets a ticket to Glasto. Check it out here http://spotthebull.orange.co.uk/

Bull

It's a digital version of the old classic "Guess Where the Cow is Going To Crap In The Field"....it's an old world country life digital mashup.

A good example of an integrated piece of communications - I'm not convinced that the web is a very good display medium, so it is ideas like this that will increasingly come to the fore as we become better adept at thinking up nice ideas that work on and offline. The more converged the world becomes, the easier this will be. 

Story from Faris over at Talent Imitates, Genius Steals. I rest my case. 

Steve

May 14, 2007

Volvo - Love it or Hate it...um, neither really...

Volvo have launched their new car the C30 on the back of the line "Love it or Hate it." I'm going to ignore the fact that I have heard that line somewhere before, and carry on with making my point.

My point is that the stereotypical view of Volvo is that they neither inspire love nor hatred; they are the very definition of bland. The great thing about the Marmite campaign was that everyone does either love it or hate it, you get very few sitters on the fence.

Marmite was then founded on a very simple but very perceptive piece of consumer insight.

I'm not sure that Volvo can claim the same for their new campaign though. A great consumer insight about Volvo would be that everyone thinks they are boring, middle of the road, uninspiring (etc).

Instead it seems like they have tried to manufacture a controversy out of nothing.

And if you look at their website which is http://www.volvocars.com/campaigns/MY07/C30/OpenDoors/default.htm

they are practically begging for people to have extreme opinions. Which I'm not sure they will - I can imagine most people will be left fairly ambivalent and maybe a little confused by their latest campaign.

The car brand that for me has shown the best consumer insight of (semi) recent times is Skoda - they directly steered towards the reputation that Skoda's had of being complete heaps of junk and made it integral to their campaign.

If you look at this commercial, and compare it to the frenetic mix of Volvo's new campaign, it's clear which one is based on the purer consumer insight (I actually struggled to find the images I remember from the campaign, but hopefully this one illustrates my point:Skoda_2

 

Anyway I'd prefer clear strategy that comes from a great consumer insight over frenetic, let's try and shoe horn some controversy to drive user engagement in order to tick the web 2.0 box any day.

I hate bitching about something that has had so much time and effort put into it, but I just think Volvo missed a trick by not 'doing a skoda' and addressing the topic that may be most painful for them (i.e. their cars are dull) but may have the most traction with consumers.

Said my piece for today.

Have a nice evening all round.

Steve

May 10, 2007

Content Creation vs Content Consumption

This is the age of content creation. This is the age of consumers generating their own content, consumers taking control away from companies, brands, broadcasters and the rest.....however:

A new study by Hitwise apparently suggests that the number of generators of user-generated content is even smaller:

"A tiny 0.16 percent of visits to Google's top video-sharing site, YouTube, are by users seeking to upload video for others to watch, according to a study of online surfing data by Bill Tancer, an analyst with Web audience measurement firm Hitwise. Similarly, only two-tenths of one percent of visits to Flickr, a popular photo-editing site owned by Yahoo Inc., are to upload new photos, the Hitwise study found."

What this shows is that although there are now more ways in which to express yourself and create your own content, only a very few number of people actually end up doing it. A chap I work with, Chris Stephenson who writes here points out that the major factors that prevent everyone from being a creator are talent and resources:

this cap on creation was historically down, I suppose, to two factors: firstly ability - not everyone is a Gaudí or Tolkien.  but secondly it was determined by an individuals capacity to create and the resources available to them...creation comes at a cost (be it resources or time), and not everyone can afford

Now I agree with him that the second factor - cost - has been negated to a certain extent by the explosion of web 2.0 - literally everyone can create and dsitribute their own content. If you look at the penetration of mobile phones capable of taking video footage, arguably everyone has the capability to be a film maker - just think of the massacre at Virginia Tech where one of the most broadcast pieces of footage was from a mobile phone.

However, the factor that will not change is that not everyone can physically produce good content, because not everyone has the talent. It's probably an extreme case of the 80:20 rule where 80 percent of the best content is being produced by 20 (or in this case even lower) percent of people.

Now to put a final spin on it, a quote by Ivan at futurelab where this story came from is:

"the bigger force is not consumer-generated content, it's consumer-edited content."

So someone with the talent creates it, and someone with less talent takes it, tinkers with it, maybe improves it?

May 01, 2007

CHina to overtake Germany as world's no.1 trader

CHINA SET TO TOPPLE GERMANY AS WORLD NO. 2 TRADER THIS YEAR

GUANGZHOU, China: Claiming a projected US$2.1 trillion (€1.54tr; £1.05tr) in foreign trade in 2007, the People's Paradise will this year replace Germany as the globe's second largest trading nation, according to Li Yushi, vp of the Research Institute of International Trade and Economic Cooperation.

If this performance is sustained, says the researcher, China will in 2010 supplant the USA as world numero uno by trading volume. And - some believe - militarily.

Yushi told a seminar on foreign trade prospects: "China maintained a growth rate of more than 20% foreign trade in the first quarter and is likely to maintain the momentum throughout the year.

"Based on these predictions," he said, "we can tell that China will overtake the United States to be the world's largest trader in 2010."

Which in itself is a huge piece of news....but when you combine it with the fact that according to Mckinsey, "85% of Chinese people stop watching TV during the commercials" - All those people, all that money, how do you reach them? 

April 24, 2007

I AM MEDIA

Check out this presentation below, brought to you courtesy of Futurelab - some great stats about the death of old media and the birth of a new social dialogue....

85% of Chinese people don't watch commercials - that's a lot of ad avoidance going on!

April 17, 2007

No more advertising - Sao Paulo Bans Outdoor Ads

The governors of Sao Paulo have just decreed that all outdoor advertising in the city will have to be removed by the start of the new year - the city is going ad free! The International Herald Tribune reports it in the following way:

Come the new year, this city of 11 million, overwhelmed by what the authorities call visual pollution, plans to press the "delete all" button and offer its residents unimpeded views of their surroundings.

But in proposing to transform the landscape, officials have unleashed debate and brought into conflict sharply differing concepts of what this city, South America's largest and most prosperous, should be.

The statute's most visible impact promises to be at eye level and above. The outsized billboards and screens that dominate the skyline, promoting everything from automobiles, jeans and cellphones to banks and sex shops, will have to come down. All other forms of publicity in public spaces, like distribution of fliers, will also stop.

The law also regulates the dimensions of store signs, and will force many well-known companies to reduce them substantially by a formula based on the size of their facades. Another provision, much criticized by owners of transportation companies, outlaws advertising of any kind on the sides of the city's thousands of buses and taxis.

By removing all of the traditional media channels that are quick and easy ways to reach a large audience, albeit superficially at times, it will undoubtedly force marketers to re-focus on the consumers they are trying to reach and the best ways in which to do that.

Anthony Mayfield in his post on this in his blog Open talks about this forcing marketing to become more useful and relevant to the consumer - like search, for example. Traditional media channels whilst providing reach lack a depth of engagement that can be provided through social media and the opportunities that web 2.0 offers.

April 11, 2007

Ask.com - Advertising the Online Offline

So Ask.com have been advertising heavily on TV, Radio and Outdoor for a month or so in an effort to make people aware that there is an alternative to Google when it comes to search.

They had to do something, as Google is already synonymous with 'search' for the majority of internet users.

What is interesting though is that they have chosen traditional media channels to try and influence people's online behaviour. This could illustrate a number of things:

a) Ask.com have failed spectacularly to reach people while they are online, because when people are online, they automatically go to Google - using Google for search is the equivalent for many of using a kettle to boil water

b) That people use search as their gateway to the internet, and Google guards the gateway - users first go to Google, then go wherever it is they want to go. This means that you have to reach people before they are online, otherwise Ask.com will never reach them with their message. 

c) There is still real value in the traditional media channels when it comes to influencing people and changing behaviours.

d) Search is now a product just like any other - and consumers have a choice about who they use to provide this service.

Hope everyone had a happy easter!

February 14, 2007

Brand's Green Behaviour

OK I found this article about exploiting or tapping into the green potential of brands. To be honest, I could waffle about this myself but I thought I would just put the whole article up. It's from the World Advertising Research Centre. Enjoy:

Unlocking naturals

Shaziya Khan

It is curious, do you not think? In so many business discussions, far-thinking worthies have agreed that 'naturals' is big and naturals is here to stay, blah, blah. And in so many varied businesses – such as beverages, skin care, hair care, food products, lifestyle, leisure, fashion, travel destinations and even jewellery – there is growing evidence that consumers consider a natural or nature-based appeal to be highly inviting and motivating. And yet the size of 'natural' business in many categories remains niche.

That is curious.

It leads one to ask a few fundamental questions.

  • If, attitudinally, consumers are actively green, why are they passively green behaviourally? Or, worse, neutral?

  • Is there something about the appeal and aura of naturals that their marketing is not touching upon?

  • Why have businessmen/marketers not been able to fully leverage green inclinations?

Is this an area where consumers are indeed ahead of marketers? It appears to be.

GREEN IS KEEN

Naturals are growing in appeal across markets. Often in flat categories the natural segment is the growing (albeit niche) one. There is prolific consumer evidence that people, attitudinally, actively prefer naturals.

Several advantages of naturals are both felt and perceived. From a purely product-use point of view, naturals promise no side effects, holistic impact, non-intrusive action and long-term benefits. This 'functional' or product-derived credibility consumers associate with naturals, across product categories, is well established. And what is especially significant is that most younger consumers are pro-natural. This is borne out strongly in recent research.

GREEN INCLINED, HELL YEAH!

Young people (15–19 year olds) who will be the mainstream consumers of tomorrow show strong 'green' leanings. Lifestyle and attitude research based on the TGI (Target Group Index) with an all-India sample size of 17,000 confirmed these pro-naturals attitudes; 15–19 year olds in metro areas strongly agree that:

  • they are prepared to pay more for environmentally friendly product–index 121

  • given a choice they would prefer to use a herbal rather than a non-herbal product: – index 110.

The question is: if the appeal of naturals is so evident, the potential of naturals so avowedly ripe, why then are naturals businesses not the sweeping success they were meant to be?

This thesis seeks to bridge the chasm between the business potential and the business promise of naturals. Beyond particular category contexts, it brings to life the fundamentally different stance a naturals business must embrace for consumers to embrace it in turn.

SOME HYPOTHESES

1. Examine 'the other 50%'.

Marketing theory tells us that, beyond functionality, as much as 50% of the over-all appeal of a category or brand is driven by its emotional appeal or 'tug'. So, let us examine if there is a deep and powerful 'emotionale' (emotional appeal) driving the buzz around naturals.

Few business ideas in today's choice-cluttered world have the credibility, appeal and broad acceptance that naturals enjoy. So, beyond their rationale, could there be a latent 'emotionale' that (dormant) naturals businesses have not tapped into?

2. No more research please. How about using category archaeology instead?

It is fair to say that naturals, being a growing segment, must be among the most researched fields – qualitatively and quantitatively, as well as in R&D terms. So still more research is not going to unpeel this onion (pun intended).

However, starting from a different standpoint, like category archaeology, might. This is a tool from cultural anthropology that can be applied to business and marketing, and it is especially useful when we are seeking answers to a fundamental question like ours.

Category archaeology unearths hidden meanings and associations that exist in people's collective understanding, and is often remarkably revelatory. Given the momentum that naturals have built up over the years, and the overall attitudinal support and acceptance of naturals, is there a meaning and association around naturals buried deep in people's minds, somewhere glossy research reports don't reach? Is this something we can unearth and then leverage to free the frozen potential of naturals?

THE DUALITY OF NATURALS

Armed with these two hypotheses as an intellectual starting point of inquiry, we started to 'dig'. As we dug into naturals as an overarching category, irrespective of products, we came across a revelation: functionally, naturals are very strong and credible – clearly evident are their long-term benefits and lack of negative side effects, regardless of particular product or service functions. However, beyond their functional fitness, naturalness, as an overall appeal, has a duality.

One one hand, there is the dark side of naturals. In projective terms this comes across vividly. The dark side of naturals is personified and visualised as old and dark, literally and metaphorically. Old age, grandfather, therapeutic, dull, old songs, black and white, no colour, disease, ayurveda. This side of naturals comes with all the credibility and authority of naturals but with sensory, emotional and cultural associations that are decidedly off-putting, old-fashioned, very distant and aged from today's consumers. (Note, this in the context of younger consumers being especially pro-natural.)

But, on the other hand, another side to naturals was revealed. This is the bright side of naturals, which gets equally vividly unearthed in projective terms. It is envisioned as bright and young, both literally and metaphorically. Young, feminine, passionate, stylish, individualistic, artistic, yellow and fuschia (very bright pink), liberating, opinionated, philosophy-based, life-changing, substantive, warm, contemporary, with it.

This is a side of naturals that continues to be associated with all the credibility and authority of naturals but also carries with it rich and ripe sensory, emotional and cultural associations and meanings.

The bright side of naturals is surprisingly stylish and design-orientated. Indeed, the foundations of its distinctive style quotient lie in an attitude to life that is absolutely at the cutting edge of modernity. It is more and more genuinely modern than clichéd/stereotype modern. This bright side of naturals embraces an overarching life philosophy that is in sync with and inspires its design philosophy. As a result, the bright side of naturals embraces choices that are passionate and with it, like:

  • linen over denim

  • ceramics over bone china

  • the beach run over the gym treadmill

  • juice over cola

  • environmental activism over biological engineering

  • happiness over success.

This bright side is a 'new age' stance to naturals that shares the credibility and authority of 'old' naturals, but with an incredibly complementing 'wind beneath its wings' kind of cultural and emotional resonance.

In a nutshell, the archaeology reveals that the surface meaning of naturals is uni-dimensional and 'dark', but the deeper meaning of naturals is multidimensional and 'bright'. The surface meaning of naturals is uni-dimensional – safe, traditional, knowledgeable products: seen as 'very good but not for me'. However, the deeper meaning of naturals is multi-dimensional (about a way of living) – it reveals that the world has moved from natural to 'being natural', seen as a 'new age way of being that inspires me'.

THE LITMUS LENS FOR AUDITING NATURALS

Voilà! The key to unlocking and then enlarging the appeal of naturals across businesses.

Much of the existing branding of naturals, if audited through the dark and light litmus lens of this thesis would reveal a simple binary split.

1. When a brand falls on the dark side of naturals, then it is building the natural appeal, but with a cultural resonance that is out of step with the category appeal at large. It is old-age and off-putting marketing, that slices 'advantage attitude' back to 'behavioural deuce'.

2. When a brand is on the bright side of naturals, it leverages the attitudinal, life choices and design philosophy that 'being natural' stands for. It has a beyond-product appeal that resonates with the culture and the times of 'being natural'. This makes for a brand that embodies not just the letter but also the contemporary spirit of 'being natural'. So it has a lift and a draw that is hugely attractive and potentially iconic.

HOW TO BE ON THE BRIGHT SIDE OF NATURALS

Some businesses and brands have begun to scratch the surface of 'being natural' – in India, for example, Fructis, Santoor, Khadi, Kerala Ayurvedic Massage, Margo; but there is a lot of ground to cover before they find their space in the sun. They can get there by stepping more fully into the bright side of naturals. Our archaeology has revealed life choices, design philosophy and individualism as the emotionale for naturals. These are the potential building blocks of the bright side.

Marketing has a rich canvas to draw on to build the bright side of naturals across product categories.

• Life choices: natural brands and businesses that build an association with causes, institutions, values that are about 'interesting', or 'took the road less travelled' choices are a natural fit – because naturals are associated with taking a higher way or more spiritual or alternative route on life's path. Thus associating natural brands with life choices or giving natural brands a credo about making 'higher' life choices would unleash a powerful emotionale for people to adopt them into their lives. Many people who lead mainstream lives would fulfil their desire for higher life choices at least vicariously in making product or service choices that ring truer and higher than their other life choices.

For example, I may not be able to express my environmental values in life, but I do always buy x because it is 100% organic and I value that. Body Shop was among the earliest beauty businesses to be built on a credo of no animal testing. It cashed in big time on a powerful, albeit latent, emotionale and went on to became a lighthouse brand (famous and well known even among those not knowing of that business) and a meteorically fast-growing business.

• Design philosophy: one of the other key embedded associations of naturals, and one that is very meaningful, is a high design orientation. First, this draws on the immensely majestic and prolific beauty of nature. Second, it relates to much of the truly modern, cutting-edge design, across categories, that has tended to be anchored in something natural, for example: in clothes – linen; in bags – jute; in lifestyle – items like ceramics, furniture such as South-East Asian wood; and so forth. So both from their natural world associations and design world associations, natural brands have a great fit for embodying a design philosophy.

Apple in the world of computers is a business built on outstanding design in everything from an orange/turquoise laptop to an asymmetrical mouse to a curvy keyboard. Its design philosophy underscores its overall credo of thinking different. Get this – natural businesses and brands have great potential to do an Apple. In fact more so than Apple – so centrally is design philosophy associated with being natural. Spa-like hotels have just begun to tap into this space.

• Individualism: the value of individualism is gaining currency and is associated with being contemporary because it stands for a high level of confidence and clarity of purpose. Individualism promises to be a powerful building block for creating iconic natural brands because naturals embody passionate belief, conviction, high standards, willingness to go against the crowd. These are the values that seem to get strongly associated with naturals as a category and are very akin to the values of individualism.

People will happily and contentedly make natural brand choices that enable them to fuel their hunger for individualism, at least vicariously. This insight can be used in many ways, not the least of which is associating a business with appropriate brand ambassadors. For example, Rolex is a brand that associates itself with successful performers (and gets to be seen as one itself). Natural brands have as great a fit, potentially, to be associated with individualism. The point here is to present the discriminating lens for picking ambassadors for natural brands (not the usual glamour and fame) but blazing individualism, conviction and enough self-belief to go against the crowd. Someone with all of the above? He or she is a natural, so hurry! How about 'Angelina Jolie for Khadi'? Wouldn't that make the Versace wannabes do a u-turn?

BE BRIGHT, BE RIGHT

The revelation of deep embedded meanings and associations of naturals as an incredibly attractive and appealing new-age choice that encompasses life choices, design philosophies, spirited individualism, gives a powerful resonance to what 'being natural' really is. And it is there for us to mine – and to do so in all aspects of a natural business: brand, product, promotion, packaging, communication, and so forth. In sum, natural products may have been discovered in the long past, the dark ages; however natural brands are potentially new age, bright and iconic, if we take naturals out of the dark side. Marketers, are you building the (b)right side of naturals? It surely is a most curious thing.

Reprinted with permission from Businessworld, India's largest selling and most widely read business magazine (www.businessworld.in).


NOTES & EXHIBITS



Shaziya Khan

Shaziya Khan is vice president and strategic planning director at JWT, a WPP company. Based in the India office she is currently involved with a regional planning assignment on Unilever brands.

shaziya.khan@jwt.com